PERLUNYA MANUSIA TERHADAP AGAMA: PERSPEKTIF METODOLOGI STUDI ISLAM

Authors

  • Zuhair Abdurrahman Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Arab, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten Author
  • Rendy Fauzi Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Arab, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten Author
  • Maftuh Ajma’in Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Arab, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64788/ar-rasyid.v2i4.334

Keywords:

Homo Religiosus, Religiosity, Modernity

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the essence of human beings as Homo Religiosus from a multidisciplinary perspective encompassing philosophical, psychological, sociological, and theological dimensions. The main focus is to demonstrate that religiosity is not merely an additional attribute but an integral part of human consciousness that drives the search for meaning and connection with transcendent reality. This research employs a qualitative method through a literature review of key thinkers such as Mircea Eliade, Rudolf Otto, and Viktor Frankl. The findings indicate that from a psychological perspective, religion functions as a mechanism for fulfilling the human need for meaning and alleviating existential anxiety, while from a sociological perspective, it serves as a foundation for moral values and social integration. Furthermore, modernity presents challenges in the form of spiritual crises and loss of meaning, which require a comprehensive methodological approach to understand religious phenomena. Therefore, integrating normative and historical approaches is essential to ensure that religious teachings remain relevant in addressing the dynamics of modern life without losing their spiritual essence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2004). Studi agama: Normativitas atau historisitas? Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1978). Islam dan sekularisme (K. Muammar, Trans.). Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

Azra, A. (2012). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi menuju milenium baru. Jakarta: Kencana.

Durkheim, É. (2001). The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dhavamony, M. (1995). Fenomenologi agama (A. Sudiarja et al., Trans.). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Eliade, M. (1987). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion (W. R. Trask, Trans.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Frankl, V. (2014). The will to meaning. London: Penguin Books.

James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.

Kant, I. (1998). Religion within the boundaries of mere reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Madjid, N. (1992). Islam: Doktrin dan peradaban. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Mudzhar, M. A. (1998). Pendekatan studi Islam dalam teori dan praktek. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Nasr, S. H. (1997). The spiritual crisis of modern man. Kuala Lumpur: ABC International Group.

Nasution, K. (2013). Pengantar studi Islam. Yogyakarta: ACAdeMIA + Tazzaffa.

O’Dea, T. F. (1996). Sosiologi agama. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Otto, R. (1958). The idea of the holy (J. W. Harvey, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.

Rahman, F. (1979). Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Wawasan Al-Qur’an: Tafsir tematik atas pelbagai persoalan umat. Bandung: Mizan.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

How to Cite

PERLUNYA MANUSIA TERHADAP AGAMA: PERSPEKTIF METODOLOGI STUDI ISLAM. (2026). Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah, 2(4), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.64788/ar-rasyid.v2i4.334