Korupsi Pertamax: Refleksi atas Krisis Integritas dan Kejujuran dalam Birokrasi Indonesia

Authors

  • Azwin Raynaldy Sinaga Jurusan Hukum - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Author
  • Regi Pramesty Sariman Putri Jurusan Hukum - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Author
  • Christiano Soeharto Hutauruk Jurusan Hukum - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Author
  • Aisyah Aldina Jurusan Hukum - Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64788/ar-rasyid.v1i6.138

Keywords:

Pertamax Corruption, Bureaucratic Integrity, Honesty, Government Reform, Anti-Corruption Measures, Public Ethics.

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia has reached an alarming level, functioning not only as a legal violation but also as a reflection of a profound moral crisis within the bureaucracy. The term “Pertamax Corruption” refers to a high-level form of corruption—beyond the mere abuse of power—indicating a systemic erosion of honesty and public integrity. This crisis reveals that corrupt practices are no longer hidden; instead, they have become embedded in bureaucratic culture, legitimized through language, social behavior, and permissive public attitudes. This study employs a qualitative method through a literature review of academic journals, reports from anti-corruption institutions, and official government publications. The findings indicate that weak oversight mechanisms, entrenched patronage, and the decline of public ethics are key factors that sustain corruption in Indonesia. Restoring public trust requires moral reform through character education, exemplary leadership, and the reinforcement of integrity across all levels of bureaucracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024: Global Report. Berlin: Transparency International.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). (2023). Laporan Tahunan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: KPK RI.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (2018). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Said, M. (2023). “Etika Integritas dan Pendidikan Antikorupsi dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Moral Bangsa.” Jurnal Integritas Nasional, 12(2), 145–160.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Haryanto, T. (2022). “Budaya Patronase dan Tantangan Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Etika Publik, 9(1), 34–50.

Yuliani, D., & Prakoso, R. (2021). “Krisis Integritas Aparatur Negara dan Implikasinya terhadap Tata Kelola Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 18(3), 202–215.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2022). Global Report on Corruption Prevention in Public Administration. Vienna: UNODC.

Fitriani, L. (2023). “Membangun Ekosistem Integritas dalam Birokrasi Publik: Strategi Pencegahan Korupsi Berbasis Nilai.” Jurnal Sosial dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(4), 221–236

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Korupsi Pertamax: Refleksi atas Krisis Integritas dan Kejujuran dalam Birokrasi Indonesia. (2025). Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah, 1(6), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.64788/ar-rasyid.v1i6.138

Similar Articles

1-10 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.