RELASI AGAMA DAN SAINS PANDANGAN IAN G. BARBOUR (KONFLIK, INDEPENDEN, DIALOG, DAN INTEGRASI)

Authors

  • Muhammad Saupiyani Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Pascasarjana UIN Antasari Banjarmasin Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64788/ar-rasyid.v1i6.199

Keywords:

Science, Religion, Conflict, Independence, Dialogue, and Integration

Abstract

This article aims to explain four models of the relationship between religion and science as proposed by Ian G. Barbour: conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration. This research approach uses a literature study method by compiling various sources of literature such as books, journals, and relevant research findings as references. The study results show that the relationship between religion and science is not always contradictory; the conflict model illustrates sharp differences between the two, the independence model emphasizes the separation of domains, the dialogue model opens space for communication and cooperation, while the integration model combines both into a harmonious unity. Based on this analysis, it can be concluded that the ideal relationship between religion and science is dialogical and integrative. Their collaboration will produce knowledge that is not only intellectually advanced but also grounded in moral and spiritual values, thereby shaping human civilization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. Amin. Islamic Studies Di Perguruan Tinggi, Pendekatan Integratif Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.

Afkarina, Miftahul, Wahyu Irawan, Abdul Haris, Abd. Malik Karim Amrullah, and Dhevin MQ Agus Puspita. “Konflik, Dialog, Dan Integrasi: Sebuah Eksplorasi Filosofis Tentang Hubungan Sains Dan Agama.” Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) 8, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.36526/js.v3i2.695.

Bahri, Syaeful. “Relasi Agama Dan Sains Dalam Tafsir Ilmi Kementerian Agama RI.” Master’s Thesis, Universitas PTIQ, 2022. https://repository.ptiq.ac.id/id/eprint/922.

Barbour, Ian Graeme. Juru Bicara Tuhan ; Antara Sains Dan Agama. Bandung: Mizan, 2002.

Hamzah, Amir. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) Kajian Filosofis, Teoritis, Aplikasi, Proses, Dan Hasil Penelitian. Revisi. Malang: Literasi Nusantara, 2020.

Haught, John F. Perjumpaan Sains Dan Agama Dari Konflik Ke Dialog. Bandung: Mizan, 2004.

Humairoh, Ayu Savana, and Ahmad Mustafidin. “Integrasi Ilmu Agama Dan Sains Dalam Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer.” NAAFI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa 2, no. 3 (2025).

Indah, Astrid Veranita. “Dialog Ilmu Dan Agama Dalam Pendidikan Islam Di Indonesia.” Aqidah-Ta: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah 8, no. 1 (2022).

Kartanegara, Mulyadhi. Menembus Batas Waktu: Panorama Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Mizan, 2002.

Meliani, Fitri, Nanat Fatah Natsir, and Erni Haryanti. “Sumbangan Pemikiran Ian G. Barbour Mengenai Relasi Sains Dan Agama Terhadap Islamisasi Sains.” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 4, no. 7 (November 2021): 673–88. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v4i7.331.

Muchasan, Ali. “Relasi Agama Dan Sains.” Inovatif: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Agama, Dan Kebudayaan 6, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.55148/inovatif.v6i1.159.

Nasution, Harun. Islam Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Aspeknya. Jakarta: UI Press, 1985.

Putra, Roni, Abu Bakar, and M. Nazir. “Implikasi Integrasi Sains Dan Agama Terhadap Pendidikan Islam.” Journal on Education 6, no. 1 (2023).

Rundell, Michael. Macmillan English Dictionary, For Advanced Leraners: International Student Edition. Oxford: Macmillan Publisher Limited, 2002.

Warisin, Khoirul. “Relasi Sains Dan Agama Perspektif Ian G. Barbour Dan Armahedi Mazhar.” Rahmatan Lil Alamin Journal of Peace Education and Islamic Studies 1, no. 1 (2018).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

RELASI AGAMA DAN SAINS PANDANGAN IAN G. BARBOUR (KONFLIK, INDEPENDEN, DIALOG, DAN INTEGRASI). (2025). Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah, 1(6), 691-700. https://doi.org/10.64788/ar-rasyid.v1i6.199

Similar Articles

21-30 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.